1. Ethical Opposition to Palantir's Surveillance and Defense Ties
Users urge boycotting Palantir due to its US government contracts (ICE, DoD), surveillance role, and leaders' views. "Everyone should say no to palantir anywhere, especially outside the US." (anonzzzies). "Palantir is explicitly and openly fascist rather than just doing fascism on the side." (mrcartmeneses). Concerns include NHS data access via CLOUD Act and Gaza involvement.
2. Hypocrisy in Singling Out Palantir vs. Other Tech Giants
Many argue Palantir faces undue scrutiny; Google, Amazon, Microsoft also have defense deals. "You should also include Google, Microsoft, Amazon... any tech company that has a defence contract." (rvz). "Large tech companies are defense contractors now." (heavyset_go). "Whataboutism... Incrementalism is better than nothing." (exBarrelSpoiler).
3. Foundry's Practical Value for Complex Healthcare Data
Defenders praise Palantir's Foundry for NHS data integration/ontologies amid legacy systems. "Foundry has a good toolset for the job... certified with all the fedramp whatnot." (adolph). "Data integration is literally Palantir's business." (dzhiurgis). Critics note expense/lock-in, but see it solving real NHS challenges.