Summary of Key Themes
1. Innovative autoredesearch‑driven HTML‑to‑DOCX conversion
The scoring loop that iteratively improves fidelity while keeping documents editable is highlighted as clever.
"That’s an interesting approach. It’s a beautiful thing to watch." (fishbone)
2. Need for real Microsoft Word validation
Several commenters stress that only the full Office suite can catch certain validation errors, so testing with Word is essential.
"Would it be possible to swap out LibreOffice for actual MS Word in this workflow? (m_w_)"
3. Scope limitations and demand for larger‑document testing
Early tests use small HTML fragments; users note that larger docs with tables and figures may break, prompting plans to expand testing.
"It produces garbage with larger documents with tables and figures." (exceptione)