1. Superficial or Meaningless Connections
Many users criticized the LLM-generated links between books/phrases as weak, arbitrary, or hallucinatory.
"Aurornis: "The visual style... looks neat, but the connections don’t seem correct."
"smusamashah: "the connected words have absolutely zero connection with each other."
"timoth3y: "it's an LLM Rorschach test where we are given random connections and asked to do the mental work."
"tmountain: "The links drawn between the books are 'weaker than weak'."
2. Distinct LLM Style and "Slop"
Commenters immediately spotted AI hallmarks in descriptions and outputs.
"Aurornis: "many of the descriptions have a distinct LLM-style voice... I would have immediately recognized many of the motifs."
"pmaze: "The names & descriptions definitely have that distinct LLM flavour."
"typon: "Just standard LLM slop once if you actually have read some of these books."
"drakeballew: "egregious, obviously referential LLM dog."
3. Value as Innovative Tool for Discovery
Praise for the concept's potential in "distant/syntopical reading," UI, and augmenting human insight, despite flaws.
"pxc: "distant reading... zoom out to hundreds... using computers to search... insights that only emerge from large bodies."
"Balgair: "This is his Syntopicon for modern works... Brilliant!"
"znnajdla: "It takes a very high degree of artistic creativity... Every one of these connected threads are really good."
"sciences44: "Love the originality here - makes you curious to explore more. Solid technical execution."