Theme 1 – Preferring Accessibility API over screenshot + OCR
Many participants favor reading text directly via the OS Accessibility API to avoid the macOS screen‑sharing warning that comes with capturing the viewport.
“Because you then have the macOS orange screen sharing warning/icon. I don't really want to record my screen, just the text is enough.” – Dramatize
Theme 2 – Limitations of raw accessibility extraction
The discussion repeatedly notes that most applications don’t expose clean, structured accessibility data, requiring per‑app tweaks and resulting in loss of formatting.
“most apps just aren’t wired up right… you end up having to hand code a lot of specific profiles for specific apps… you don’t quite get the right level of detail.” – etchalon
Theme 3 – Hoping for smarter, model‑based interpretation
Several commenters envision lightweight vision or language models that could infer UI semantics from limited text, possibly enriched with file/URL references or ambient context, to make the extracted data more useful.
“I hope in near future … that layer of abstraction … could probably become a light‑weight fine‑tuned vision model … that can run fully locally.” – albert_e
“The lossiness is also why the file/URL references exist… the LLM reading the file can open the original if the fragments aren’t enough.” – Dramatize