1. Skills Preferred Over MCP for Lightweight Efficiency
Users favor Skills as simpler, less context-polluting alternatives to MCP, ideal for local prompts and instructions.
- "I have seen ~10 IQ points drop with each MCP I added. I have replaced them all with either skill-like instructions" – asadm
- "Skills keep the context out unless it's needed. It's a much better system in my experience." – AndyNemmity
- "Skills are specific, contextual, and persistent (stateful) whereas LLMs are not" – verdverm
2. Skepticism on Longevity of Agent Standards
Many doubt Skills, MCP, and similar will endure amid rapid evolution and proliferation of frameworks.
- "How likely are we to look back on Agent/MCP/Skills as some early Netscape peculiarity?" – reedf1
- "The agentic development scene has slowly turned into a full-blown JavaScript circus" – mrbonner
- "Agent/MCP/Skills might be 'Netscape-y' in the sense that today's formats will evolve fast." – irrationalfab
3. Practical Value in Real-World Use Cases
Despite doubts, users report high ROI in encoding knowledge, integrations, and workflows like biotech research or migrations.
- "In the context I work in (biotech) I've found it a pretty high-ROI way to give lots of different types of researchers access to a variety of tools" – anthuswilliams
- "Skills have been really helpful in my team as we've been encoding tribal knowledge" – detkin
- "I used one to migrate a site from WordPress to Sanity... much quicker and more flexible" – james2doyle