1. Cultural/Leadership Discipline Over Scheduling Hacks
Punctuality requires strong culture and enforcement, not time shifts. "There's no substitute for leadership establishing a culture of meeting discipline." (rectang) "Meetings running over is avoidable. People just need to stop enabling bad behavior." (al_borland)
2. Novelty Fades; Meetings Slip Anyway (Treadmill Effect)
Shifting starts creates temporary relief but people adjust, running late regardless. "Yeah, this works because it's novel. If it became the norm, people would adjust to it and we'd right back where we started." (wvenable) "We do this at my work and guess what - meetings tend to run 5 minutes late because everyone knows the next meeting doesnβt start until 5 past." (exegete)
3. Works Well in Some Orgs, Builds Break Acceptance
Effective in disciplined tech cultures like Qualcomm/Google for bio-breaks. "This is standard at the large tech company where I work and is extremely effective and universally respected." (etrautmann) "We've been doing this at Qualcomm for a while, and I really like it... the practice has still built this acceptance around short breaks between meetings." (kayson)
4. Prefer Ending Early or Shorter Meetings
Ending 5 min early > starting late; pair with agendas/fewer meetings. "To me ending at 0:55 is a million times more logical than starting at 0:05." (bonesss) "Only host important meetings. Cancel useless ones. Start and end on time." (MeetingsBrowser)