Theme 1 – Telegram’s design is seen as inherently insecure / backdoor‑like
- erelong: “I thought telegram was flagged as insecure like a decade ago, it's never really been 'very secure'”
- maqp: “The main spy feature that is Telegram collecting 100% of content and metadata is the main feature for every intelligence agency …”
Theme 2 – The flaw is rooted in broad OS file‑access; sandboxing is the remedy
- Panzerschrek: “It's a vulnerability of all modern desktop operating systems allowing any user process to read/write any user file.”
- saagarjha: “Telegram is available sandboxed from the Mac App Store on macOS.”
- zorked: “It is also sandboxed in Flatpak.”
Theme 3 – Users accept the risk for UX, trust, or political reasons
- misiek08: “Still we are using it, because UX kills any other app and people that are (probably) behind it will cause almost no harm to casual, not‑interesting people :)”
- lifeisloving: “I dont write off software because where the person that made it was born.”
- maqp: “The little I have to run Telegram Desktop for, I run in a VM. I'd never let the little oligarch's code touch my desktop OS.”