1. Distrust of Paxton's Motives
Despite agreeing on TV privacy issues, many view the lawsuit as political theater, shakedown, or electioneering rather than genuine protection.
"This is either a misdirection, shakedown or revenge" (bsder).
"This is about being in the news as much as possible. He is in a close 3 way race" (1659447091).
"Vizio is the absolute worst... so now it's clear Texas is really just trying to bully Walmart's competition" (babypuncher).
2. Smart TVs as Invasive Surveillance Devices
Broad consensus on ACR spying, ads, and telemetry, even on HDMI inputs; Vizio's exclusion highlights hypocrisy.
"These 'smart' TVs still capture screenshots from HDMI inputs" (smileybarry).
"The TVs 'are effectively Chinese-sponsored surveillance devices'" (c420, quoting lawsuit).
"All of the big TV makers except Vizio which is owned by Walmart, of course, who happens to do ACR" (smileybarry).
3. Demand for Dumb TVs and Workarounds
Users prefer non-smart displays, external streamers (e.g., Apple TV), or offline HDMI; market fails without regulation.
"Just donβt connect your TV to the internet" (raw_anon_1111).
"I just want a somewhat trustworthy organization to develop a 'DUMB' certification" (ortusdux).
"The solution is a separate, internet connected device... connected to a non-connected tv" (chasing0entropy).