Three prevalent themes in the discussion
- MapQuest’s low‑quality, ad‑driven nature
- “They're owned by System1, a bottom‑of‑the‑barrel advertising company where 1990s web brands go to die (Metacrawler? Startpage.com?? Dogpile?!?!). Their maps are OpenStreetMaps maps.” – wlonkly
-
Commenters repeatedly note that MapQuest is now essentially an ad‑wrapper over OSM data, with poor routing and intrusive ads.
-
Who should decide geographic names – government, popular usage, or corporations?
- “The government has no right to name geographic features. The names are established by popular usage, not the feds.” – bigstrat2003
- “I get why people want Apple and Google to push back but ultimately there isn’t any logical approach for them to operate that isn’t ‘name things as the relevant governmental bodies name them’. Otherwise what source of truth is there?” – afavour
-
The thread debates whether tech companies must follow executive orders or can rely on popular usage / their own judgment.
-
The executive order is viewed as a petty tantrum or deliberate manipulation
- “Problem with the 'childish' take is it waves off the admins statements they intentionally engage in this shit to rile up the terminally online lizard brains. This is intentional manipulation.” – d34db33ts
- “Dictators make spurious announcements in order to see who obeys and who doesn't, and then punish those who didn't, in order to further their own grip on power.” – amiga386
- Many see the renaming as a symbolic, attention‑grabbing act rather than a substantive policy change.