Three prevalent themes in the discussion
- Nostalgia and regret over Smalltalk’s decline
Many commenters mourn that a technically superior language failed to dominate and express the joy they felt when using it. - “I am … mostly sad about the incredible language that should have 'won' .. well .. everything!” – mwnorman2
-
“I really loved it. What I admired most was that you ‘lived’ in your program.” – jttnr
-
Smalltalk’s lasting influence on other languages and tools
Users repeatedly point out how Smalltalk shaped later environments such as Objective‑C/NeXTSTEP, Java’s VM, Self, and even modern IDEs. - “A lot of people don't know that Smalltalk heavily influenced NeXTSTEP and Objective‑C.” – slowin
- “Which then influenced Mesa, Cedar, Interlisp‑D … which had an influence on Rob Pike … on how he developed ACME for Plan 9.” – pjmlp
-
“NeXTSTEP can be thought of as a ‘pragmatic Smalltalk environment’ … built on Objective‑C.” – linguae
-
Cost, licensing, and the rise of free/open‑source Smalltalks
The high price of commercial Smalltalk offerings is contrasted with the availability of free implementations like Pharo and Squeak, which keep the language alive for hobbyists and educators. - “I really wish that there was a license/version/build marketed to hobbyists: >Call or Email for Pricing and the upgrade pricing is four figures.” – WillAdams
- “Dad is … a happy user of pharo nowadays which is free, opensource and under active development.” – Paradigm2020
- “There is Pharo (and Squeak) as a free SmallTalk.” – pasc1878
- “Instantiations … still ship a new release every year of Smalltalk.” – wslh