1. Rigor Required for Claiming Transcendentality
Debate over including unproven cases like Euler-Mascheroni constant (γ) in lists of transcendentals, insisting on mathematical proof over belief.
"If it’s not proven transcendental, it’s not to be considered such." - loloquwowndueo
"Math assumes that a claim is proven. Math is much stricter compared to most natural... sciences." - senfiaj
"Not proven to be transcendental, but generally believed to be by mathematicians." - auggierose (defending inclusion)
2. Definability, Computability, and "Almost All" Numbers
Philosophical discussion on uncountably many transcendentals being undefinable/computable, with debates on reality, models, and paradoxes like Skolem's.
"Almost all numbers are transcendental... Finding new transcendental numbers is trivial." - mg
"Most reals cannot be described in any human sense." - wiml
"it is possible for all real numbers... to be definable under ZFC." - dwohnitmok (challenging undefinability)
3. Fame, Utility, and Practical Importance of Constants
Critiques of list's "fame" (e.g., manufactured numbers) and downplaying e's role vs. alternatives like ln(2) or 2π in applications.
"The number e... does not have any importance in practice." - adrian_b
"Chapernowne's number... occur in nature, or was it just manufactured?" - drob518
"e^(iπ) = -1... d/dx e^x = e^x." - qnleigh (defending e's utility)