1. SQL’s entrenched dominance and the high bar for a successor
"It's unfair, but my first thought after reading the abstract was \"oh great, another one\"." (bbkane)
2. Inherent flaws in SQL’s semantics (nulls, bags vs. sets)
"SQL is _insanely bad and complex." (mamcx)
"It again ignore the best solution for nulls: Algebraic types." (mamcx)
"2 identical values can’t exist… then it means that this is second‑class." (mamcx*)
3. Preference for SQL despite its drawbacks, and calls for better relational models
"sql is one of my favourite languages that i deal with on a regular basis." (bawolff)
These three themes capture the main points of the discussion.