6 Most Prevalent Themes
1. Skepticism about Trump's reliability
Many doubt the policy will materialize, citing Trump's history of unfulfilled promises. "Trump, notoriously, says all sorts of things. I'm sure this'll come right after he finishes his healthcare plans in 'two weeks'" (ceejayoz). "Believe it when you see it folks. No sooner" (ggoo).
2. Minimal institutional ownership (0.5%)
Institutional investors hold few homes overall, so banning them changes little. "Institutional investors only own about 0.5% of homes" (Aurornis). "Publicly traded companies account for a tiny, tiny fraction of available single family homes in the US" (legitster).
3. Root cause is housing supply shortages
Zoning, NIMBYism, and regulations restrict building, not investors. "The problem is not owning multiple properties, but untaxed land ownership" (kiba). "High housing prices are due to zoning-based supply restrictions" (andrewmutz).
4. Support for banning corporate SFH ownership
Homes should be for families, not profit. ""People live in homes, not corporations," Trump said. Very surprisingly progressive opinions from Trump" (kingstnap). "Banning Wall Street from buying single-family homes is a great thing that I completely support" (Simulacra).
5. Enforcement challenges and loopholes
LLCs, small investors, and privacy needs evade bans. "if this gets implemented at all, hopefully it does not affect the common practice of having a self-owned LLC owning your home" (JoshTriplett). "companies (and individual very rich people) are amazingly inventive when it comes to finding loopholes" (impendia).
6. Populist appeal with limited real impact
Policy is political theater targeting "Wall Street" anger. "it's pretty good politics to ban a mostly imaginary thing that is a popular talking point" (xp84). "Investor owned housing is a bit of a sensationalist scapegoat" (legitster).