1. The “why” behind 2>&1 – low‑level mechanics vs muscle memory
Many users explain the syntax in terms of the underlying dup2() call, while others treat it as a learned shorthand.
“
2>&1is into the file descriptor pointed to by 1, and at the time any reasonable programmer would have known that fd 1 == STDOUT.” – WJW
“The distinction between file descriptors and regular files trips up many people at first. Recognizing that&signifies a file descriptor clears up the confusion about the syntax.” – hrmtst93837
“I found the explanation useful, about why it is that way.” – ElijahLynn
2. Practical value of redirecting stderr to stdout
The pattern is used for logging, debugging, and piping output from tools that emit errors to stderr.
“Humans used this combination extensively for decades too. I'm no aware of any other simple way to grep both stdout and stderr from a process.” – WhyNotHugo
“I have used this in the past when building shell scripts and Makefiles to orchestrate an existing build system.” – jez
“It was a trick you can use if you've got a super chatty script or set of scripts, you want to silence or slurp up all of their output, but you still want to allow some mechanism for printing directly to the terminal.” – jez
3. The shell’s terse, sometimes opaque syntax – a source of frustration
Users debate whether the syntax is intuitive, a relic of early Unix, or a barrier for newcomers.
“Shell syntax is anything but simple or logical.” – phailhaus
“I think the shell author needed some way to distinguish file descriptor 1 from a file named “1” (note that 2>1 means to write stderr to the file named “1”), and ‘&’ was one of the few available characters.” – jibal
“The shell syntactical sugars also have some weird gotchas.” – goku12
4. Learning resources and the role of LLMs vs human help
Participants point to manuals, shellcheck, and the limitations of AI-generated answers.
“The Redirections section of the manual is just seven US Letter pages.” – simoncion
“Shellcheck catches lots of things and shall really make your Bash scripts better.” – TacticalCoder
“I love that this situation occured.” – ifh‑hn (highlighting the confusion that still exists even with modern tools)
“I think it’s a reminder of how archaic the systems we use are.” – amelius
These four themes capture the bulk of the discussion: the mechanics of the syntax, its real‑world utility, the frustration it can cause, and the tools (manuals, linters, LLMs) people use to master it.