Three dominant themes in the discussion
-
Market‑first thinking ignores systemic risks – Many commenters criticize the “optimize for the number” mentality that treats public‑health needs as optional side‑effects.
“vrganj: You gotta optimize everything for the market man! It's magic! Everything will work out if we only make number go up! … Number must go up!”
-
Domestic supply‑chain and raw‑material limitations – Several users point out that the U.S. lacks key inputs (e.g., nitrile‑butadiene rubber) and that existing capacity is insufficient, making glove production costly and dependent on imports.
“wildzzz: The issue is that domestic sources of NBR are few because of the type of petroleum extraction we do here. This makes the cost of NBR relatively high and consequently makes the gloves pricey compared to imported ones.”
-
Perceived industrial decline / inability to mobilize production despite resources – The conversation repeatedly frames recent U.S. struggles to restart essential manufacturing (gloves, PPE, etc.) as evidence of broader decline, even when capital and expertise exist.
“jongjong: In most of the west, technically talented people are fully subjugated to suits … The market here is completely smothered by regulations. … It would be a worse experience and less profitable; and you'd have to be filthy rich just to get a chance to engage in that highly constrained, mediocre business activity.”