3 Prevalent Themes
| Theme | Supporting Quote |
|---|---|
| 1. The piece reads more like career advice / self‑promotion than technical guidance. | “It is not technical advice. It seems some general career advice for tech people (don't just think in technical context). But mainly it is an ad to hire her as your coach.” — lukan |
| 2. Take the useful bits and ignore the rest; don’t outright reject the whole article. | “Instead of discarding the whole thing, just take what's good and leave the rest.” — MDCore |
| 3. Distinguish scientific model‑building from consulting‑style model‑selling, including the missing consultancy steps. | “Scientists and consultants both build models… The scientists do: … The consultants do: …” — nilirl “You’re missing the consulting steps: 0: Figure out what to build. -1: Win contract. -2: Declare that you have the best model and it’s perfect for this client.” — taneq |
The three themes capture the community’s critique of the article’s purpose, the recommended approach to using it, and the nuanced comparison of modeling mind‑sets.