1. Impracticality of Solar Panels on Ships (Due to Low Yield, Weight, Maintenance)
Majority view: Surface area too small, harsh marine environment, adds complexity/weight for negligible gain.
"Same reason EVs rarely have solar panels; adds weight and complexity, making it more expensive than putting the panels somewhere less wet and salty." -servo_sausage
"The 5-10% number is completely invented. I doubt it's half as high as 5%..." -SideburnsOfDoom
"Ship battery is 40,000 kwh and uses at least 10,000 kwh per crossing... A handful of kwh are negligible." -s1artibartfast
2. Superiority of Land-Based Solar
Cheaper installation, maintenance, higher output, longer lifespan.
"Probably more efficient to keep inverters, panels etc on land." -victorbjorklund
"More efficient to spend the same amount of money on shoreside panels with lower installation costs." -scraptor
"You can already drive an EV indefinitely, by mounting a much larger surface area of solar panels on your house..." -SideburnsOfDoom
3. Ferry's Battery/Charging Suited for Short Route
90-min trips, quick port charging during turnaround suffices; no need for full capacity per crossing.
"Journey... 90 minutes and it can charge... in 8 minutes. Offloading... takes much longer." -gbear605
"Charging from 80% to 100% is a lot slower... sweet spot is probably around the 20-80% mark." -jillesvangurp
"...charges 10.5 kV, 600Amp and 10.5MW... 6 minutes... enough to suffice for the journey." -robin_reala (quoting Γresund ferries)