1. Wayland is the inevitable future – but the transition will be painful
Many users see the move to Wayland as the only viable path forward, yet they also warn that the shift will be slow and fraught with bugs.
“Wayland appears to be the future, and Rust is a good way to help avoid many compositor crashes” – jchw
“The arguments for it have boiled down to ‘yuck code older than me’ … it feels like a regression” – ok123456
2. X11‑centric users fear losing the familiar, lightweight experience
A sizable portion of the community worries that the rewrite will break the “just‑work” simplicity that Xfce is known for, and that the X11 codebase will be abandoned.
“Literally no user cares what language a project is implemented in … we want things to ‘just work’ and not change for no good reason” – coldpie
“I’m a long‑time XFCE user … I don’t think this is accurate. We want things to ‘just work’” – coldpie
3. Technical debate: modularity, performance, and fragmentation
The discussion is split over whether Wayland’s architecture is truly more modular, whether it introduces latency, and how the proliferation of compositors affects stability.
“Wayland is far more modular … it conflates the window manager, the compositor, and the display server” – saurik
“Wayland has been consistently slower than X11 … the compositor will have to render a frame at some point after the VBlank signal” – jchw
4. Funding, donations, and community effort
Users emphasize the importance of financial support for the project and question whether the community is investing in maintenance versus new development.
“If you use Xfce I urge you to donate to their Open Collective” – hu3
“I think a lot of the time people are just writing new code instead of fixing existing things” – uecker
These four themes capture the main currents of opinion in the thread: optimism about Wayland’s future, concern for legacy users, technical trade‑offs, and the role of community support.