Three prevalent themes in the discussion
- Critique of distant/absentee ownership leading to bland, under‑invested neighborhoods
- “It’s not anti 7‑11, it’s against underinvestment in local properties and lack of reasonable planning, driven by distant ownership.” – iamnothere
- “The author has some valid points… people criticise business decisions made to appease shareholders without realising they may be the shareholders in a roundabout way.” – Laforet
-
“Absentee owners should be taxed out of existence. The distance between an investment and the people who understand it is a law enforcement liability…” – pessimizer
-
Personal appreciation of local convenience stores as functional and charming despite ownership
- “Point is: I enjoy my neighborhood 7‑11 without caring about how it looks, who owns it, or worrying about all the capitalism trade‑offs. It's just a 7‑11. The charm is the walk and the experience.” – jafo1989
-
“I've been walking to my 7‑11 for over 30 years, and have gotten to know many attendants over the years.” – jafo1989
-
Financial‑investment perspective: REIT performance, Vanguard, retirement, and wealth‑building
- “Bogle (Mr Vanguard himself) saw this coming and warned us, but it was perhaps too late: [link]” – bombcar
- “So Vanguard owns one‑eighth of ADC, an REIT whose stock price has declined 2.65% in the last 5 years. Surely there is space in the market for a smaller, leaner, possibly privately‑owned REIT…” – schnevets
- “On the flip side: your retirement is dependent on the property listed in the article and if no improvements are needed while it generates a return… It means you’re a landlord!” – rootsudo