1. Power imbalance – police enjoy special privileges the public does not
“Well I mean the state does have the monopoly on violence.” – hypfer
“police are able to do many things that the general public aren't allowed to do, in order to do their jobs.” – joemi
2. Flock’s legality rests on the claim there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in public
“Most of those caveats are about spaces that aren't actually public… there's not much in the way of restrictions, and nothing where police have special privileges.” – wat10000
“Isn't Flock's alleged legality predicated on the principle that there is no 'reasonable expectation of privacy' in public?” – caconym_
3. Police frequently misuse Flock data (stalking ex‑partners, harassment) with little oversight
“There's a list of 81 known instances of police stalking romantic interests, sometimes querying Flock hundreds of times… Some of the cases involve sexual assault and kidnapping as well.” – redwall_hp
“Police officers can stalk their exes over 2000 times…” – ajsnigrutin
4. Calls to ban Flock or impose symmetric surveillance (“watch the watchers”)
“The clear solution is to ban it, but our Government has both a financial and power stake in keeping people surveilled…” – ToucanLoucan
“I don't want HN'ers setting up surveillance networks… So this post, bringing attention to that issue, is good, imo.” – ImPostingOnHN